David Icke in conversation with Mordechai Krispijn, Jeroen Pols, and Willem Engel regarding the lawsuit concerning the travel ban.
By Mordechai Krispijn:
We have received a letter from the court informing us that the investigation is being reopened!
That is quite a surprising turn of events, to say the least.
What’s going on?
David Icke was, in our opinion, unjustly denied entry based on the Schengen Agreement. This mainly revolves around Article 24.
What we’ve discovered is that an important paragraph within this article was modified on March 9th. This amendment is clearly in favor of David Icke.
Prior to this amendment, the article left some room for interpretation, which the State Secretary, in our view completely unwarranted, tried to exploit.
This article has now been modified, presumably to prevent abuse by states. A state must now provide much more specific grounds for refusing entry to a non-resident of the country. And these grounds must be very serious. For instance, someone must have been convicted of a criminal offense or at least be under suspicion.
Looking at the differences, it might not seem like a significant change. However, from a legal perspective, it’s night and day. This is one of the reasons the court has reopened the investigation.
The State Secretary now has one week to respond to the court’s questions. Presumably, the lawyer will argue that the article should be applied as it was on November 6, 2022. However, this is unsustainable because, at this moment, with the revised article already in effect, David Icke cannot travel.
Let’s not celebrate prematurely. On the other hand, due to this modification, the path to victory seems bigger than ever.
Source: https://mordechaikrispijn.nl/david-icke-deel-6-een-verrassende-wending/